On 24/12/12 14:38, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
On 12/23/12 8:48 PM, David Wood wrote:
On Dec 22, 2012, at 17:23, Kingsley Idehen <[email protected]>
wrote:
On 12/22/12 11:25 AM, Melvin Carvalho wrote:
So I think anyone register this, if there's interest, it would
probably just need to reopen the conversation with the sparql wg
mail list, I think.
I suggest, you just do it :-)
Normally, I'd agree, but in this case I think the SPARQL WG thread is
worth reading; they have a good point.
Help me with a link to the specific point. I've taken a quick look and
haven't found anything that changes my position re. "just do it".
Discoverability remains something that's received too little attention
re. Linked Data, SPARQL, and RDF. It isn't something best handled (a as
prescription) by the W3C (IMHO). When best practices have been
established, the W3C can come in and formalize etc..
void descriptions and service descriptions provide searchable documents?
At least they provide an answer to what to put at a well-known URI.
We need to bootstrap first, and the formalize standardization later. The
alternative route never works, as you can see from the age of the
initial suggestion re. this matter :-)
A good argument ... for using sitemaps·
Andy
Happy Holidays to you and everyone else on the list !
Regards,
Dave
--
Regards,
Kingsley Idehen
Founder & CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
