Kingsley, do you have a particular form in mind?
I've suggested to Maria a simple SKOS taxonomy reflecting the
organisation of tools in the curriculum, tagging DoaP descriptions
(retrieved or reconstructed).
I'm particularly interested in EUCLID as we're committed to monitoring
the discussion on fora such as this, and this would be a great source of
both labels and aggregation (there are some tools whose mention is
rather seldom - certainly a few have come up that I hadn't heard of).
Rather than fixed Turtle I'd provide an endpoint at the project server,
together with the monitoring results.
Barry
On 29/03/13 13:50, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
On 3/29/13 9:41 AM, Maria Maleshkova wrote:
Thank you for the feedback!
I am currently collecting as many visualisation-tools and have to
started to classify them a bit, to list the type of functionalities
that they support and the level of maturity of the implementation
(prototype vs. product)
This is why the list in the outline was a bit incomplete.
Naturally, I will post the results here, hoping to get them ready
quire soon.
What about publishing a Turtle doc?
