Hi, I think this is not the point. One small step we can do is offer authors a simple template to author papers with. Basically you want to provide something that mimic the style and some of the constraint of a traditional latex or word forma, but that of course offer something more (at the very list, the possibility to reference URIs and embed some RDFa). It's a small step, but it may work and it could be a positive experience.
best, Andrea Il giorno 26/apr/2013, alle ore 12:26, Kingsley Idehen <[email protected]> ha scritto: > On 4/25/13 7:04 PM, Andrea Splendiani wrote: >> Hi, >> >> ok, from this the previous Kingsley post, you suggest metadata as >> annotation, and not structuring the content of the paper per se. >> Maybe one idea could be to provide a (x)html+RDFa (or even only a Turtle) >> template to fill for the submission. This, we can do... >> Should we draft one ? > > I suggest you do. Ideally, using the file create, save, and share pattern. As > part of this effort, you can apply ACLs to the published Turtle docs such > that resource privileges can be scoped to specific identities or groups of > identities. > > Links: > > 1. http://bit.ly/QUfkJ6 -- using WebID and RDF based entity relationship > semantics to drive Web resource access control. > > Kingsley >> >> ciao, >> Andrea >> >> Il giorno 25/apr/2013, alle ore 19:46, Sarven Capadisli <[email protected]> ha >> scritto: >> >>> On 04/25/2013 04:57 PM, Andrea Splendiani wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Ok, let's take a practical step. >>>> Let's assume we are going to open a call for a workshop and there we ask >>>> for "structured information". Which steps do we take and what do we need? >>>> >>>> If we want to move one step at a time, we would still need a site to >>>> handle the submission/review process (you cannot rely on online feedback >>>> for accepting/rejecting papers with no bias in a given timeframe). >>>> Something like easychair accepts the upload of extra files, so that >>>> could be used already off the shelf. >>>> >>>> Second, we need to specify where and how Redfin should be used. If we >>>> are in the sw/ld area, what for? We may ask for Uris for: >>>> Citations >>>> Authors >>>> Tools? Ontologies? >>>> >>>> What else ? >>>> >>>> Take for example the papers here: >>>> >>>> http://www.jbiomedsem.com/series/SWAT4LSCSHALS >>>> >>>> What would you propose for this kind o research? >>> It could be practically anything that the authors find worthwhile to have >>> an URI for discovery. In addition to Kingsley's points, here are mine: >>> >>> * Problems, hypothesis, contributions, claims, results, conclusions >>> * If in the form of a blog post, comments, replies, reviews etc. on the >>> page could be invaluable. >>> * Licensing >>> >>> There is also some excellent work done with SPAR (Semantic Publishing and >>> Referencing Ontologies) [1], [2]. >>> >>> [1] http://sempublishing.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/sempublishing/SPAR/ >>> [2] >>> http://opencitations.wordpress.com/2010/10/14/introducing-the-semantic-publishing-and-referencing-spar-ontologies/ >>> >>> -Sarven >>> >>> >> >> >> > > > -- > > Regards, > > Kingsley Idehen > Founder & CEO > OpenLink Software > Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com > Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen > Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen > Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about > LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen > > > > >
