On 4/26/13 8:35 PM, Andrea Splendiani wrote:
Hi,I think this is not the point. One small step we can do is offer authors a simple template to author papers with. Basically you want to provide something that mimic the style and some of the constraint of a traditional latex or word forma, but that of course offer something more (at the very list, the possibility to reference URIs and embed some RDFa). It's a small step, but it may work and it could be a positive experience.
My point was: you crowd-source templates so that even the template itself benefits from "many eyes and minds". You can't crowd-source effectively without performing said activity in a data space where access controls are part of the setup.
Kingsley
best, Andrea Il giorno 26/apr/2013, alle ore 12:26, Kingsley Idehen <[email protected]> ha scritto:On 4/25/13 7:04 PM, Andrea Splendiani wrote:Hi, ok, from this the previous Kingsley post, you suggest metadata as annotation, and not structuring the content of the paper per se. Maybe one idea could be to provide a (x)html+RDFa (or even only a Turtle) template to fill for the submission. This, we can do... Should we draft one ?I suggest you do. Ideally, using the file create, save, and share pattern. As part of this effort, you can apply ACLs to the published Turtle docs such that resource privileges can be scoped to specific identities or groups of identities. Links: 1. http://bit.ly/QUfkJ6 -- using WebID and RDF based entity relationship semantics to drive Web resource access control. Kingsleyciao, Andrea Il giorno 25/apr/2013, alle ore 19:46, Sarven Capadisli <[email protected]> ha scritto:On 04/25/2013 04:57 PM, Andrea Splendiani wrote:Hi, Ok, let's take a practical step. Let's assume we are going to open a call for a workshop and there we ask for "structured information". Which steps do we take and what do we need? If we want to move one step at a time, we would still need a site to handle the submission/review process (you cannot rely on online feedback for accepting/rejecting papers with no bias in a given timeframe). Something like easychair accepts the upload of extra files, so that could be used already off the shelf. Second, we need to specify where and how Redfin should be used. If we are in the sw/ld area, what for? We may ask for Uris for: Citations Authors Tools? Ontologies? What else ? Take for example the papers here: http://www.jbiomedsem.com/series/SWAT4LSCSHALS What would you propose for this kind o research?It could be practically anything that the authors find worthwhile to have an URI for discovery. In addition to Kingsley's points, here are mine: * Problems, hypothesis, contributions, claims, results, conclusions * If in the form of a blog post, comments, replies, reviews etc. on the page could be invaluable. * Licensing There is also some excellent work done with SPAR (Semantic Publishing and Referencing Ontologies) [1], [2]. [1] http://sempublishing.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/sempublishing/SPAR/ [2] http://opencitations.wordpress.com/2010/10/14/introducing-the-semantic-publishing-and-referencing-spar-ontologies/ -Sarven-- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
-- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
