Am 06.05.2013 15:33 schrieb Leonard Rosenthol : > On 5/6/13 9:24 AM, "Sarven Capadisli" <[email protected]> wrote: > >>On 05/06/2013 02:55 PM, Leonard Rosenthol wrote: >>> What format(s) are being used today that are not "web friendly"? >>> >>> PDF, for example, is a formal and official part of the open web. In >>>fact, >>> it is a normative reference in the HTML5 specification from the W3C. >> >>"Web friendly" here refers to native to the Web. > > Again, PDF is an official part of the open web - as defined by the W3C. > How much more "native" is there??
see below > >>Given that generalization, PDF is not as Web friendly as HTML and >>friends, > > That is a definition that YOU have chosen. It is not one that is used by > any official standards body, government regulation, etc. As such, it's use > creates confusion amongst the uninformed user and that's certainly > something none of us want. In the contrary , these official standard bodys are uninformed and thus is the normal user. There are many Articles explaining the cons (and pros) of PDF, e. g [1]. oo [1]http://www.siamcomm.com/website-design/using-pdf-files-pros-and-cons/
