On 6/18/13 2:03 AM, David Booth wrote:
On 06/18/2013 01:42 AM, エリクソン トーレ wrote:One could argue that these examples, while not being RDF, still adhere to the RDF abstract syntax (triples describing typed directed relationships between resource).But that's what RDF *is* -- the abstract syntax. RDF is syntax independent.
Not only is it syntax independent, it's devoid of genealogy too :-)You are turning RDF's meaning away from "Resource Description Framework" to "Reality Distortion Field". Luckily, I believe only a minority of folks hold the distorted views you continue to espouse in this debate.
-- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
