On 6/18/13 3:41 AM, Michael Brunnbauer wrote:
hi all,On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 12:44:23AM -0400, David Booth wrote:... if there is a standards-based way to interpret it as RDF, then it qualifies as Linked Data.+1 This looks like a nice definition of Linked Data to me.
-1 It's broken.It only palatable in the context of a W3C spec. Again, this debate isn't about how the W3C defines Linked Data in its specs. This is about a fundamental concept associated with structured data representation.
Again, the fact that this list is hosted on a W3C server doesn't mean that when we speak about the concept of Linked Data we are automatically discussing a W3C world view. FWIW this list didn't start off as a W3C hosted list.
Regards, Michael Brunnbauer
-- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
