On 6/24/13 10:32 AM, Pat Hayes wrote:
If you can give up on all this, what do you take yourself to be referring to when you say 
"RDF" ? You have just dismissed virtually every defining characteristic of RDF 
as either wrong or inessential. So what is left?

Pat
I am going to create a poll aimed as getting a feel for what folks perceive as the defining characteristics of RDF. In recent times, I've come to believe those characteristics aren't so clear anymore.

Here's a draft of the questions for the poll:

1. Don't know
2. Don't care
3. Linked Data Creation
4. Interpretable Linked Data Creation
5. W3C standard.

To you and anyone else that might be interested, are there any other questions I should add to the list above?

--

Regards,

Kingsley Idehen 
Founder & CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen





Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Reply via email to