On 6/24/13 3:52 PM, Gregg Reynolds wrote:
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Kingsley Idehen
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 6/24/13 10:32 AM, Pat Hayes wrote:
If you can give up on all this, what do you take yourself to be referring
to when you say "RDF" ? You have just dismissed virtually every defining
characteristic of RDF as either wrong or inessential. So what is left?

Pat
I am going to create a poll aimed as getting a feel for what folks perceive
as the defining characteristics of RDF. In recent times, I've come to
believe those characteristics aren't so clear anymore.
Kingsley, Kingsley, Kingsley, you old thread hijacker you. ;)  Best of
luck, but for the record, I don't have a dog in that fight.  As far as
I'm concerned people can use RDF to mean whatever they want it to
mean, as long as the software works.

-Gregg



Gregg,

There is an issue here that for whatever reasons simply keeps on getting lost. The question is simple: what are the unique characteristics of RDF? What does RDF do uniquely?

I actually believe RDF does have unique characteristics, but I am curious to see if mine are in alignment with views of others.

I really don't want RDF to become something that's based on a leap of faith, we can do much better than that :-)

--

Regards,

Kingsley Idehen 
Founder & CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen





Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Reply via email to