Boris, that's really interesting, I wasn't aware.
Under mappings, though, I just see directory listings and no version
control - if these remain under git(hub) would you poll them?
Cheers,
Barry
On 12/07/13 13:35, Boris Villazon-Terrazas wrote:
Hi Barry
This is not fully related with your question. But, within mappingpedia
initiative [1] we are collecting RDB2RDF mappings. So, your mappings
would be useful for us.
We are developing a vocab for describing the mappings, and we will
include the licence information.
Boris
[1] http://mappingpedia.linkeddata.es/
On 12/07/2013 14:20, Barry Norton wrote:
I'd like to publicly release R2RML mappings for the MusicBrainz
dataset. DBpedia has shown interest in including the subset that can
be used to create a linkset.
Any idea what (kind of) licence could/should apply? (To be clear, to
the mappings, as opposed to the dataset)
I'd also like to attach, since R2RML is RDF, a licence and
attribution on a per rr:TriplesMap basis. (The mappings are hosted on
github and contributions will be accepted as I'm never going to get
through all of the MB Advanced Relationships, a moving target, myself
and I'm being a bottleneck.)
The question's also been raised on whether a given licence can in
turn impose conditions on the triples that are created using it (as
derivative works)? Does that sound feasible?
Any input appreciated.
Barry
