Incidentally, to clarify, I meant to ask a more fundamental question
about mappings: are these creative works, deserving themselves of a CC
license, or executable code, deserving of a code license?
Whichever way, I'd like to make them as encumbered as possible.
Barry
On 12/07/13 13:20, Barry Norton wrote:
I'd like to publicly release R2RML mappings for the MusicBrainz
dataset. DBpedia has shown interest in including the subset that can
be used to create a linkset.
Any idea what (kind of) licence could/should apply? (To be clear, to
the mappings, as opposed to the dataset)
I'd also like to attach, since R2RML is RDF, a licence and attribution
on a per rr:TriplesMap basis. (The mappings are hosted on github and
contributions will be accepted as I'm never going to get through all
of the MB Advanced Relationships, a moving target, myself and I'm
being a bottleneck.)
The question's also been raised on whether a given licence can in turn
impose conditions on the triples that are created using it (as
derivative works)? Does that sound feasible?
Any input appreciated.
Barry
