On 25 Jun 2014, at 04:21, Niklas Lindström <[email protected]> wrote:
> The second and last values are not allowed according to the OWL, right? > Perhaps it should be documented somewhere that the vCard ontology is more > restrictive than the RFC. > > Actually, even in the updated ontology definition, the range of vcard:bday > still prohibits a plain xsd:date (i.e., when properly formatted, the first > example). This should definitely be fixed. Thanks Niklas...we are documenting all feedback and errata on the vCard Ontology NOTE here: https://www.w3.org/wiki/RepresentingVCardinRDFOWL for future revision. Cheers... Renato Iannella Semantic Identity http://semanticidentity.com Mobile: +61 4 1313 2206
