On 10/06/2014 11:00 AM, Phillip Lord wrote:
"Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <[email protected]> writes:
On 10/06/2014 09:32 AM, Phillip Lord wrote:
"Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <[email protected]> writes:
Who cares what the authors intend? I mean, they are not reading the
paper, are they?
For reviewing, what the authors intend is extremely important. Having
different rendering of the paper interfere with the authors' message is
something that should be avoided at all costs.
Really? So, for example, you think that a reviewer with impared vision
should, for example, be forced to review a paper using the authors
rendering, regardless of whether they can read it or not?
No, but this is not what I was talking about. I was talking about
interfering with the authors' message via changes from the rendering
that the authors' set up.
It *is* exactly what you are talking about.
Well, maybe I was not being clear, but I thought that I was talking about
rendering changes interfering with comprehension of the authors' intent.
peter
[...]
