On 2014-10-08 14:10, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
Done.The goal of a new paper-preparation and display system should, however, be to be better than what is currently available. Most HTML-based solutions do not exploit the benefits of HTML, strangely enough. Consider, for example, citation links. They generally jump you to the references section. They should instead pop up the reference, as is done in Wikipedia. Similarly for links to figures. Instead of blindly jumping to the figure, they should do something better, perhaps popping up the figure or, if the figure is already visible, just highlighting it. I have put in both of these as issues.
Thanks a lot for the issues! Really great to have this feedback.I have resolved and commented on some of those already, and will look at the rest very shortly.
I am all for improving the interaction as well. I'd like to state again that the development was so far focused on adhering to the LNCS/ACM guidelines, and improving the final PDF/print product. That is to get on reasonable grounds with the "state of the art".
Moving on: I plan to bring in the interaction and framework to easily semantically enrich the document as well as the overall UX. I have some preliminary code in my dev branch, and will bring it forward, and would like feedback as well.
Thanks again and please continue to bring forward any issues or feature requests. Contributors are most welcome!
-Sarven http://csarven.ca/#i
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
