On 10/8/14 10:18 AM, Sarven Capadisli wrote:
On 2014-10-08 15:14, Luca Matteis wrote:
Dear Sarven,

I really appreciate the work that you're doing with trying to style an
HTML page to look similar to the Latex templates. But there's so many
typesetting details that are not available in browsers, which means
you're going to do a lot of DOM hacking to be able to produce the same
quality typography that Latex is capable of. Latex will justify text,
automatically hyphenate, provide proper spacing, and other typesetting
features. Not to mention kerning. Kerning is a *huge* thing in
typography and with HTML you're stuck with creating a DOM element for
every single letter - yup you heard me right.

I think it would be super cool to create some sort of JavaScript
framework that would enable the same level of typography that Latex is
capable of, but you'll eventually hit some hard limitations and you'll
probably be stuck drawing on a canvas.

What are your ideas regarding these problems?

We do not have to have everything pixel perfect and comprehensive all up front. That is a common pitfall. Applying the Pareto principle is preferable.

LaTeX is great for what it is intended for! This was never in question. We are however looking at a bigger picture for Web Science communication and access. There will be far more concerns than the presentation layer alone.

As for your technical questions: we need to create issues or features, and more importantly, open discussions like in these threads, to better understand what the SW research community's needs are. So, please create an issue because what you raise is important to be looked into further. I do not have all the technical answers, even though I am very close to the world of typeface, typography, and book design :)

In any case, if it was possible in LaTeX, I hope it is not naive of me to say that it can be achieved (if not already) in HTML+CSS+JavaScript.

-Sarven
http://csarven.ca/#i
Sarven,

Linked Open Data dogfooding, re., issue tracking i.e., a 5-Star Linked Open Data URI that identifies Github issue tracker for Linked Data Research:

[1] http://linkeddata.uriburner.com/about/id/entity/https/github.com/csarven/linked-research/issues/4 -- Linked Open Data URI (basic entity description page) [2] http://linkeddata.uriburner.com/c/8FDBH7 -- deeper follow-your-nose over relations facets oriented entity description page [3] http://bit.ly/vapor-report-on-linked-data-uri-that-identifies-a-github-issue-re-linked-research-data -- Vapor Report (re., Linked Open Data principles adherence) .

--
Regards,

Kingsley Idehen 
Founder & CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog 1: http://kidehen.blogspot.com
Personal Weblog 2: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter Profile: https://twitter.com/kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Personal WebID: http://kingsley.idehen.net/dataspace/person/kidehen#this

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Reply via email to