Thanks everyone! DOAP + PROV sounds like a good idea actually.
On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 8:36 AM, Graham Klyne <g...@ninebynine.org> wrote: > On 08/08/2016 14:57, Martynas Jusevičius wrote: >> >> DOAP vocabulary comes very close: https://github.com/edumbill/doap >> >> Too bad it looks to be unmaintained. Strangely, the schema does not >> seem to support relationships (dependencies) between projects. > > > Just a thought: would DOAP + PROV fit the bill? > > #g > -- >