Hi Paul, > Le 10 août 2016 à 11:26, Paul Worrall <paul.worr...@interition.net> a écrit : > > I had been working on describing software https://sparqlycode.com/ > <https://sparqlycode.com/> . It used DOAP and PROV and its own vocab. > Produced RDF/OWL representations of the code, its build, version history > etc.. I could’t get an early adopter so I abondoned it last year. > > Would be happy to help someone pick up on the code.
You can also help the community by submitting the vocabulary [0] for inclusion into LOV [1]. That would be great and a good way to watch any adopter of the vocab. [0] http://lov.okfn.org/dataset/lov/suggest <http://lov.okfn.org/dataset/lov/suggest> [1] lov.okfn.org/dataset/lov/ <http://lov.okfn.org/dataset/lov/> > > > Paul Worrall > > Interition: wisdom in the web > > web: www.interition.net <http://www.interition.net/>, www.zonafide.net > <http://www.zonafide.net/> > email: paul.worr...@interition.net <mailto:paul.worr...@interition.net> > twitter: @interition > mobile: +44 (0) 771 133 0213 > phone: +44 (0) 203 637 5196 > eth: 0x93d41b29acf6204c9a9f03e335988e498388a2cc > > Registered in England and Wales. Number 08460806 > Registered office: Elm Barn, Stoke Golding Lane, Higham on the Hill, > Nuneaton,CV13 6ES > > > > > > > >> On 9 Aug 2016, at 07:36, Graham Klyne <g...@ninebynine.org >> <mailto:g...@ninebynine.org>> wrote: >> >> On 08/08/2016 14:57, Martynas Jusevičius wrote: >>> DOAP vocabulary comes very close: https://github.com/edumbill/doap >>> <https://github.com/edumbill/doap> >>> >>> Too bad it looks to be unmaintained. Strangely, the schema does not >>> seem to support relationships (dependencies) between projects. >> >> Just a thought: would DOAP + PROV fit the bill? >> >> #g >> -- >> >> > --------------------------------------- Ghislain A. Atemezing, Ph.D Mail: ghislain.atemez...@gmail.com Web: https://w3id.org/people/gatemezing <http://www.atemezing.org/> Twitter: @gatemezing About Me: https://about.me/ghislain.atemezing <https://about.me/ghislain.atemezing>