Manu Sporny wrote:
>general feeling was that HTML5 was far more exciting than XHTML2.
>[1] http://north.webdirections.org/
Karl Dubost wrote:
>RDFa will require it would seem, a similar community and effort to
become equally established.
In my opinion, a street level view;
The likes of Ivan, Karl, Doug, many W3C others, are doing an outstanding
job, thank you.
HTML 5, was created out of a deep pool of frustration, poor leadership
from the top people at the W3C, nothing has changed.
Friends of XHTML, are seeing a train wreck, the same "old" W3C
"hero-worshiped" "leadership" does nothing of any substance to join the
battle. HTML 5 has won by default.
Who, Where? is the top representative from the W3C in the html5/xhtml5
process.
Marketing RDFa? Get someone to lead the effort in the html5/xhtml5
battle before it is over.
RDFa, without a meaningful relationship with HTML 5, a bleak future?
