On 17 Jul 2009, at 20:05, Ben Adida wrote:
Ok, I definitely want this to be done in the *right* OWL way, but with the least amount of complexity possible. For example, I'd like this to be usable with the simplest variant of OWL.
The simplest version of OWL that the OWL spec defines is "OWL Lite", and rdfs:subClassOf, rdfs:subPropertyOf, owl:equivalentClass and owl:equivalentProperty all work there.
Of course, if you just use rdfs:subClassOf and rdfs:subPropertyOf, you don't need any OWL at all - RDFS reasoning is sufficient.
<#Ben> myvocab:name "Ben" . myvocab:name rdfs:subPropertyOf foaf:name . is enough information to reason that the following is true: <#Ben> foaf:name "Ben" . -- Toby A Inkster <mailto:m...@tobyinkster.co.uk> <http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
