Ben Adida wrote: > > The overall amount of work should be pretty much the same. > >> 1. A comformant RDFa processor is required to dereference the URI >> http://myvocab.org/#, extract the RDF data there, > > No, definitely not proposing that :) >
Good! :-) >> 2. But, if that is _not_ the case, ie, RDFa processors are not required >> to do all that, then I do not understand what the proposal really brings >> that is not, in theory, part of the RDF/OWL infrastructure as of today. > > The only change is to allow for setting a default CURIE prefix that > allows you to interpret rel="email" > Ah. O.k., I can buy that. But then all the other discussion about OWL and others is irrelevant, isn't it? I mean: it is irrelevant with respect to RDFa... it just the general SW architecture. Ivan -- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
