Hi Mark, thanks for pointing out the possibilities!
2009-12-01 01:05 Mark Birbeck <mark.birb...@webbackplane.com>: > > It might be helpful to specify these keywords as a part of an XML schema. > > (Note: When I use the lowercase word "schema" I mean the general concept, > > not the particular language XML Schema.) Think of annotating an XML > > schema by pointing to classes/properties in an ontology. Has anything > > like that ever been done? > > Points we've been considering are whether to use @profile to import > these mappings, whether RDFa should be used to describe the mappings, > whether we should map tokens to URIs, or relative paths to URIs, > whether to use OWL, and so on. @profile makes a lot of sense to me. These would then preferably be profiles describing themselves in RDFa. Cheers, Christoph -- Christoph Lange, Jacobs Univ. Bremen, http://kwarc.info/clange, Skype duke4701
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
