Re: Non-XHTML host languages for RDFa

[Shane McCarron]

I have always liked @profile, but for some reason other groups seem to not like @profile and are planning to remove it from the base language (HTML5).  I imagine we could introduce a new RDFa defined generic attribute for use in RDFa dialects... or just decide we don't care. Christoph LANGE wrote: Hi Mark, thanks for pointing out the possibilities! 2009-12-01 01:05 Mark Birbeck <mark.birb...@webbackplane.com>: It might be helpful to specify these keywords as a part of an XML schema. (Note: When I use the lowercase word "schema" I mean the general concept, not the particular language XML Schema.) Think of annotating an XML schema by pointing to classes/properties in an ontology. Has anything like that ever been done? Points we've been considering are whether to use @profile to import these mappings, whether RDFa should be used to describe the mappings, whether we should map tokens to URIs, or relative paths to URIs, whether to use OWL, and so on. @profile makes a lot of sense to me. These would then preferably be profiles describing themselves in RDFa. Cheers, Christoph -- Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120 Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180 ApTest Minnesota Inet: sh...@aptest.com