Philip Taylor wrote:
Julian Reschke wrote:
Philip Taylor wrote:
...
XMLLiteral. But the SAX2 ContentHandler interface does not expose
comments to the application, so it couldn't implement this in the
same ...
It doesn't???
http://www.saxproject.org/apidoc/org/xml/sax/ContentHandler.html says it
doesn't. It is only exposed by
http://www.saxproject.org/apidoc/org/xml/sax/ext/LexicalHandler.html --
implementations that have that "optional extension" are okay (and I
assume that includes most practical implementations) but there's at
least a hypothetical concern for "core-only SAX2"-based RDFa
implementations, and it would be good to clarify the situation by adding
it to the test suite and seeing if implementors are happy with it.
That's what I though: you can get comments, but it's not the default.
I think what's really important is whether comments (and PIs) should
trigger XMLLiterals; maybe they shouldn't?
Best regards, Julian
