Julian Reschke wrote:
[...]
I think what's really important is whether comments (and PIs) should
trigger XMLLiterals; maybe they shouldn't?
I don't have a view on that, but it should be clear and consistently
implemented, so here's some suggested test cases (in roughly the
http://github.com/msporny/rdfa-test-suite/ format) which I believe match
what the RDFa spec currently requires, and which I think should be added
to the test suite:
1) Comment in node creates XMLLiteral. (Applies to both XHTML and HTML.)
xmlns:ex="http://example.org/";
<head>
<title>Test NNNN</title>
</head>
<body>
<p property="ex:test">test <!-- example --> test</p>
</body>
ASK WHERE {
<$TCPATH/NNNN.html> <http://example.org/test> "test <!-- example -->
test"^^<http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#XMLLiteral>.
}
========
2) Processing instruction in node creates XMLLiteral. (Applies only to
XHTML.)
xmlns:ex="http://example.org/";
<head>
<title>Test NNNN</title>
</head>
<body>
<p property="ex:test">test <?example?> test</p>
</body>
ASK WHERE {
<$TCPATH/NNNN.html> <http://example.org/test> "test <?example?>
test"^^<http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#XMLLiteral>.
}
========
3) CDATA in node does not create XMLLiteral. (Applies only to XHTML.)
xmlns:ex="http://example.org/";
<head>
<title>Test NNNN</title>
</head>
<body>
<p property="ex:test">test <![CDATA[example]]> test</p>
</body>
ASK WHERE {
<$TCPATH/NNNN.html> <http://example.org/test> "test example test".
}
========
Current implementations give at least three different answers to the
first test case, and at least two to the second. (I've not seen any do
anything unexpected on the third, but I saw no other test case that uses
CDATA so it seems worth having one.)
--
Philip Taylor
pj...@cam.ac.uk
