Hi,
don't know how someone reads this, who does not know all these benefits
anyways. Reads as if you are selling RDF to somebody who knows half-way
the benefits of RDF.
It would have made sense to be more precise on the privacy and security
issues. Neither RDF nor XML have been developed to address privacy /
security, and either one is highly important in healthcare systems. Do
you have even stronger arguments for privacy and security issues?
Hope this helps.
-drs-
On 15/01/2013 12:41, Joanne Luciano wrote:
Thanks for doing this.
Joanne
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 15, 2013, at 7:21 AM, David Booth<[email protected]> wrote:
FYI, here is the comment that Rafael, Michel, Conor and I submitted to
the US government Office of the National Coordinator for Health
Information Technology, in response to their RFC on "Meaningful Use"
requirements, proposing RDF / Linked Data as a universal exchange
language of healthcare:
http://dbooth.org/2013/mu/MU-Stage3-RFC-Simple-Response.pdf
Although it is too late to change that submitted comment (as the
deadline was last night), we would still appreciate any feedback or
suggestions for improvement, as I'm sure we will have to make these
arguments and explanations many more times in the future.
Thanks!
--
David Booth, Ph.D.
http://dbooth.org/
Loss of web prodigy Aaron Swartz: http://tinyurl.com/ahe2k8c
Opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily
reflect those of his employer.
--
D. Rebholz-Schuhmann - mailto:[email protected]
