On Sun, 24 Dec 2006 16:45:20 +0100, Martijn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On 12/24/06, Anne van Kesteren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, 24 Dec 2006 16:26:51 +0100, Martijn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> - It's too generic. Instead of matchAll, it could have been named
> getAll, collectAll, etc.
I would be fine with get() and getAll() on document (and element). I
agree
that they would make more sense.
Well, my point was actually that they don't make sense, since it could
mean anything.
So, I would not be happy with using those names.
Yeah, my suspicion is that that would be a step in the
much-too-generic-to-be-clear
direction that leads, down the track, to the thing that is even better
being
called something even less clear.
cheers
Chaals
--
Charles McCathieNevile, Opera Software: Standards Group
hablo español - je parle français - jeg lærer norsk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Try Opera 9 now! http://opera.com
