On Thu, 25 Jan 2007, João Eiras wrote: > > > > Given that this discussion was done behind closed doors, and given > > that there is certainly not consensus on this (the first reaction I > > saw on IRC to this was "wow, those names suck!") > > I find these much better than all other propositions, and I'm not lazy > to type longer method names, if they're descriptive. So, it's a matter > of personal opinion that "names suck".
My argument is not that the names suck. My argument is that there is not concensus, that the decision process was opaque and behind-closed-doors, and that having the working group override the editor on such a trivial issue as naming is a bad precedent for open Web spec development. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
