On 1/25/07, Jon Ferraiolo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I encourage you to read the process document
I encourage you to read the WG charter. <http://www.w3.org/2006/webapi/admin/charter> Looking over the charter, I see the proceedings of the WG are Member-Only (bad), but it also states: "For example, the Working Group should publish specifications often, send summaries of Working Group activity to a public list and participate in those public lists, responding to comments in a timely manner." If the WG doesn't provide public minutes, and doesn't otherwise respond to public comments from WG members and the general public, I think it should change its charter to be entirely Member Confidential. I wouldn't want that, but it seems like it would be more accurate. -- Robert Sayre
