* Jonas Sicking wrote: >I agree with Daniel here. I'm not really following your argument. Are we >trying to keep compatibility with the SVG spec here? Is the interface as >designed now 100% compatible with SVG?
The element count attribute is new, other than that I am not aware of differences. >If we're not 100% compatible with SVG, why would they oppose an >improvement like the suggested one? Content that uses childElements[...] would not function correctly in SVG Tiny 1.2 implementations for no particularily good reason. -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
