On Thu, 03 Apr 2008 19:04:55 +0200, Jonas Sicking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ah, thanks, that does explain the issue.
Though I think that if we want the web to have a .childElements NodeList
available then we have two options:
1. Add it to the ElementTraversal spec and have SVG Tiny say that they
no longer require the full ElementTraversal spec.
2. Add it to a separate unrelated spec, such as HTML5.
Result 2 doesn't seem any better than 1. The end result for both is that
SVG tiny only require a certain set of properties, and with 2 we'd have
to wait some undefined amount of time before getting it into an Rec,
possibly of a spec that will have a much slower adoption rate.
The result of (2) probably also means that there's both childElementCount
and childElements.length to do the same.
--
Simon Pieters
Opera Software
