On Thu, 15 May 2008, Julian Reschke wrote: > Ian Hickson wrote: > > On Thu, 15 May 2008, Julian Reschke wrote: > > > Ian Hickson wrote: > > > > On Thu, 15 May 2008, Julian Reschke wrote: > > > > > The spec can't be more "ready" than all normative references. > > > > Sure it can. The concept of "origin" (for instance) is pretty well > > > > understood by browser vendors, and HTML5 is getting progressively closer > > > > to > > > > defining it. XHR1 doesn't need it to be perfectly defined to make use of > > > > it. > > > > Same with Window, probably even more so in fact. > > > So why then is the reference to HTML5 needed? > > > > Wouldn't you just complain that Window and 'origin' were totally undefined > > if we used them without referencing something? > > That wasn't what I was suggesting.
So what are you suggesting? -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'