Ian Hickson wrote:
On Thu, 15 May 2008, Julian Reschke wrote:
Ian Hickson wrote:
On Thu, 15 May 2008, Julian Reschke wrote:
Ian Hickson wrote:
On Thu, 15 May 2008, Julian Reschke wrote:
The spec can't be more "ready" than all normative references.
Sure it can. The concept of "origin" (for instance) is pretty well
understood by browser vendors, and HTML5 is getting progressively closer
to
defining it. XHR1 doesn't need it to be perfectly defined to make use of
it.
Same with Window, probably even more so in fact.
So why then is the reference to HTML5 needed?
Wouldn't you just complain that Window and 'origin' were totally undefined
if we used them without referencing something?
That wasn't what I was suggesting.
So what are you suggesting?
I would suggest to either copy over what HTML5 currently says, or to
reference something that can be considered a stable reference.
BR, Julian
