Sunava Dutta wrote:
Inline...
-----Original Message-----
From: Jonas Sicking [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2008 2:38 PM
To: Sunava Dutta
Cc: Ian Hickson; Zhenbin Xu; [email protected]; IE8 Core AJAX SWAT
Team
Subject: Re: <New: Tracking Issues in XHR that we raised>RE: <Was:
Further LC Followup from IE> RE: Potential bugs identified in XHR LC
Test Suite
Sunava Dutta wrote:
Thanks Ian, Zhenbin for clarifying the issues and a continuing very
productive discussion.
Meanwhile, I'm summarizing some of our requests for the editor based
on issues we've had an opportunity to clarify...There are many
conversations going on and I'd hate to see points getting lost and
would like the specs/test cases updated for issues where discussions
are not ongoing.
-Ongoing discussion: Specify the parseError attributes for Document
Objects or specify this can be sent out of band. This could be
something we don't have to hold the XHR spec back for as long as we
make a note in the specification that this is pending. There are
people currently talking for and/or against it. Zhenbin is
articulating IE's point.
Sounds good to me. We have an informative "Not in this specification"
section already, sounds like a good idea to add there.
[Sunava Dutta] Sorry, I'm not quite sure what you mean here?
The current spec already contains a section listing things that we are
intentionally not putting in this version of the spec, but are
considering for future versions of the spec. I'm suggesting we add parse
error information to that list.
http://www.w3.org/TR/XMLHttpRequest/#notcovered
/ Jonas
