On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 3:44 PM, Boris Zbarsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Michael(tm) Smith wrote: >> >> It's intended in part to be a way to keep all our law-abiding >> citizen readers in the general public informed about what progress >> if any the group is making on the spec. > > But if the information is months out of date, is it useful? Seems to me > that it would be better to just make the editor's draft public and be done > with it.
Exactly. Though I still see a place of /TR/ docs in the WD phase. But we definitely need something like: ****************************************************** * THIS DOCUMENT MAY BE OUT OF DATE * * -=aways check the latest editor's draft =- * ****************************************************** (1337 ASCII art optional :P ) Anyway... -- Marcos Caceres http://datadriven.com.au
