On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 2:02 PM, Thomas Roessler <t...@w3.org> wrote: > > On 13 Jan 2009, at 09:58, Doug Schepers wrote: >>> >>> Since it can be about more than just data, e.g. images, "Cross-Origin >>> Resource Sharing" might be more appropriate. Keeping the header names >>> the same seems fine, they're just opague strings, but at least making it >>> more clear what the specification is about might help people. > >> Cross-Origin Resource Sharing seems like a pretty good name to me. >> Cross-Origin Resource and Permissions Sharing Exchange is a funnier >> acronym, but that might not be the best criteria for name selection. I >> think that images are just another kind of data, but "resource" is >> probably more evocative of a range of data types. > > I'd be very happy to see this spec's name changed to something that doesn't > confuse people.
I don't care much either way. If it confuses it seems like a good idea to rename it. / Jonas