I was going to suggest that Bryan work on Widgets 1.0: Updates. It is currently the only spec not being actively worked on.
However, Bryan, if you feel strongly about contributing to any other of the specs, then please do not hesitate to nominate a spec and section to work on. We could certainly use a hand with the new media query specs [1]. If you don't already have it, MikeSmith can set you up with CVS access. Kind regards, Marcos [1] http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-wm/Overview.src.html On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 12:48 PM, Sullivan, Bryan <[email protected]> wrote: > My regrets for this call. One input however, in the last F2F there was a call > for more editors to help speed up the widgets work (part of the AI to Dave > Rogers). Please let me know which specs need editors, and I will make a > proposal on where I can help. > > Best regards, > Bryan Sullivan | AT&T > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of Arthur Barstow > Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 5:28 AM > To: public-webapps > Subject: [widgets] Agenda for 5 March 2009 Voice Conference > > Below is the draft agenda for the March 5 Widgets Voice Conference (VC). > > Inputs and discussion before the meeting on all of the agenda topics > via public-webapps is encouraged (as it can result in a shortened > meeting). > > Logistics: > > Time: 23:00 Tokyo; 16:00 Helsinki; 15:00 Paris; 14:00 London; > 09:00 Boston; 06:00 Seattle > Duration = 60 minutes > Zakim Bridge +1.617.761.6200, conference 9231 ("WAF1") > IRC channel = #wam; irc.w3.org:6665 > Confidentiality of minutes = Public > > Agenda: > > 1. Review and tweak agenda > > 2. Announcements > > 3. DigSig + P&C synchronization - is this now addressed adequately in > the latest EDs: > > <http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets/> > <http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-digsig/> > > 4. Issue-19 - Widgets digital Signatures spec does not meet required > use cases and requirements; Proposal to Close this issue: > > <http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/issues/19> > > 5. Issue-80 - Runtime localization model for widgets; can this be > closed? > > <http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/issues/80> > > 6. Issue-82 - potential conflict between the XHTML <access> and > Widget <access> element. What, if anything, should be done: > > <http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/issues/82> > > 7. Issue-83 - Instantiated widget should not be able to read digital > signature. What is the status: > > <http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/issues/83> > > 8. Widget requirement #37 (URI scheme etc) - see e-mail from Thomas: > > <http://www.w3.org/mid/[email protected]> > > 9. Open Actions - please address your Open Actions: > > <http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/products/8> > > 10. AOB: > > a. June f2f meeting - besides Oslo/Opera and Edinburgh/OMTP, are > there any other proposals? > > b. TPAC meeting in November > > > > > -- Marcos Caceres http://datadriven.com.au
