On Apr 9, 2009, at 9:52 AM, ext Marcos Caceres wrote:
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 2:17 PM, Priestley, Mark, VF-Group
<[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Art, All,
If there is no use case for accessing this information (I was
after why
you would want to access this information because I think just
saying it
might be interesting to do so isn't justification enough), then I
think
my original proposal holds - make the signature files unavailable
to the
widget at runtime.
For clarification I was not suggesting that an API should be added to
the DigSig spec but rather that some of the information could be
exposed
via an API defined in the APIs and Events spec. But I don't think
this
is necessary or worth the additional specification effort.
FWIW, I agree with Mark.
Please propose text that will address your concerns.
-Thanks, Art Barstow
