On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 4:39 PM, Olli Pettay<olli.pet...@helsinki.fi> wrote: >> Insted it hould be just having some properties like "name" or "size". >> A good reason for having a separate object for read(). > > Well, sure, if there is a use case, File could be a separate object and > not extend FileData.
Indeed, but that is not what you have suggested so far. As stated, I have less of a problem with such a design. / Jonas