On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 4:39 PM, Olli Pettay<olli.pet...@helsinki.fi> wrote:
>> Insted it hould be just having some properties like "name" or "size".
>> A good reason for having a separate object for read().
>
> Well, sure, if there is a use case, File could be a separate object and
> not extend FileData.

Indeed, but that is not what you have suggested so far. As stated, I
have less of a problem with such a design.

/ Jonas

Reply via email to