I support this. / Jonas
On Thursday, August 13, 2009, Arthur Barstow <[email protected]> wrote: > This is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to publish new WDs of the XHR and XHR2 > specs. > > As with all of our CfCs, positive response is preferred and encouraged and > silence will be assumed to be assent. The deadline for comments is August 18. > > -Regards, Art Barstow > > > Begin forwarded message: > > > From: ext Anne van Kesteren <[email protected]> > Date: August 12, 2009 9:05:56 AM EDT > To: WebApps WG <[email protected]> > Subject: Publishing XMLHttpRequest > Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/op.uyjvz6x264w...@annevk-t60> > > The last XMLHttpRequest Working Draft was a Last Call Working Draft. As it > turned out a number of changes had to be made again. Meanwhile HTML5 also got > further along and integration with the event loop as well as the storage > mutex was desired. These are now integrated. > > The Forms WG asked for a way to set the base URL independently of the Window > object. This is now possible as a side effect of making XMLHttpRequest ready > for Web Workers. Doug Schepers asked for separate headings for each interface > member. This is now done as a side effect of making the two XMLHttpRequest > drafts more alike. > > Given the number of changes it seems best to simply publish another Working > Draft for now of both XMLHttpRequest and XMLHttpRequest Level 2 and see where > that brings us. It would help if we have more implementations trying to > seriously implement it so we could declare the draft more stable, but it > seems we are not quite there yet. > > I'd like to request that we publish these two drafts: > > http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/XMLHttpRequest/ > http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/XMLHttpRequest-2/ > > If the chairs could wave their magic wand that'd be appreciated. > > Cheers, > > > -- > Anne van Kesteren > http://annevankesteren.nl/ > > > > >
