Arthur Barstow wrote:
On Sep 1, 2009, at 6:15 AM, ext Robin Berjon wrote:
Furthermore, since the schema isn't normative anyway, I think it could
just sit in CVS like a software project and be pointed to by the
specs. No need to include it in the spec's body.
I tend to favor Robin's proposal above re how to document the schema.
Yes, this is what I intended too. Lets get it out of the P&C spec, and
move it to it's own .rng file. Robin is right to suggest taht
publication cycles are, um, less than ideal for this kind of thing anyway:)