On Jul 26, 2009, at 23:18 , Marcin Hanclik wrote:
The below 1. could be correct if assumed host is "beefdead".
I am not sure, however, whether in the widget-URI rule, we use the
authority rule from RFC3986, because it is meant to be opaque as
specified here:
http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-uri/#the-widget-uri-scheme
The idea was for the example to show an authority identifier (because
it is allowed). The idea is that it comes from the UA, and is opaque
(even though it has a string representation that matches the authority
production). I've added a comment to indicate that that is the intent.
Thanks!
--
Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/
