On Oct 12, 2009, at 3:46 AM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
On Sep 19, 2008, at 7:44 AM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
Michael(tm) Smith wrote:
It's intended in part to be a way to keep all our law-abiding
citizen readers in the general public informed about what progress
if any the group is making on the spec.
But if the information is months out of date, is it useful? Seems
to me that it would be better to just make the editor's draft
public and be done with it.
W3C Process requires us to periodically publish Working Drafts, and
by policy that is what goes under /TR/. It may be possible to change
these policies, but I think it goes way beyond the scope of this
Working Group.
I think putting a prominent link to the latest Editor's Draft in
every Working Draft is probably the best we can do without changing
W3C Process.
Oops, sorry for responding to such an ancient post. I didn't notice
the year!
- Maciej
