Arun Ranganathan wrote:
The latest revision of the FileAPI editor's draft is available here:
4. A suggestion to *not* have a separate scheme ("filedata:") in lieu of
urn:uuid:<uuid> has been the basis of a rewrite of that feature in
this version of the specification.
Is there a particular reason why a specific URI scheme needs to be
called out at all?
(there are other schemes that may be more flexible, for instance because
they allow using a UUID/String pair for identification).
Best regards, Julian