Arun Ranganathan wrote:
The latest revision of the FileAPI editor's draft is available here:

4. A suggestion to *not* have a separate scheme ("filedata:") in lieu of urn:uuid:<uuid>[2] has been the basis of a rewrite of that feature in this version of the specification.

Is there a particular reason why a specific URI scheme needs to be called out at all?

(there are other schemes that may be more flexible, for instance because they allow using a UUID/String pair for identification).

Best regards, Julian

Reply via email to