Hi Marcos,I think this is a really good piece of work - I'll be pointing a few people from other spec orgs at the draft as its addressing a common requirement.
(As an implementer I found the approach - especially the implementation reports - really useful and easy to follow in practice.)
S On 19 Jan 2010, at 15:49, Marcos Caceres wrote:
Hi all,A draft of "A Method for Writing Testable Conformance Clauses and its Applications" in now available for review online [1]. For those that have not seen it, it basically just documents how we are standardizing the Widget specs and some basic QA processes:http://dev.w3.org/2008/dev-ind-testing/extracting-test-assertions-pub.htmlPlease consider this a working draft, as it likely contains typos, and a couple of half-baked ideas, etc. Comments are, of course, welcomed. It is expected that this document will be published as a working group note at some point in the future.Kind regards, Marcos Marcos Caceres wrote:Dominique Hazael-Massieux wrote:Hi Marcos, Le mardi 05 janvier 2010 à 17:45 +0100, Dominique Hazael-Massieux a écrit :Le mardi 05 janvier 2010 à 17:44 +0100, Marcos Caceres a écrit :I was literally doing an editorial pass right now. I would appreciateanother day or two to finish (and for you and the WG to have a chance toreview the changes). If I check-in a draft by Thursday, could we aim topublish next week?Sure, sounds good to me. Thanks for your help on this!Any news on your editing pass :) ?Sorry, I'm still working on it... it's taking a little longer than I first anticipated :( I've rewritten most of it to describe a bit more clearly how the method was applied.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
