Hi Scott,
On Jan 20, 2010, at 9:51 PM, Scott Wilson <[email protected]
> wrote:
Hi Marcos,
I think this is a really good piece of work - I'll be pointing a few
people from other spec orgs at the draft as its addressing a common
requirement.
Excellent, thanks.
(As an implementer I found the approach - especially the
implementation reports - really useful and easy to follow in
practice.)
I'm happy to hear that you found them useful! In the future, I want to
make the table sortable (e.g. group by verdict or only show fails,
etc.), and allow the ability to remove implementations from table, so
it's easier to compare (e.g., A vs B). if you have any further
suggestions to make imp reports more usable, please let me know.
S
On 19 Jan 2010, at 15:49, Marcos Caceres wrote:
Hi all,
A draft of "A Method for Writing Testable Conformance Clauses and
its Applications" in now available for review online [1]. For those
that have not seen it, it basically just documents how we are
standardizing the Widget specs and some basic QA processes:
http://dev.w3.org/2008/dev-ind-testing/extracting-test-assertions-pub.html
Please consider this a working draft, as it likely contains typos,
and a couple of half-baked ideas, etc. Comments are, of course,
welcomed. It is expected that this document will be published as a
working group note at some point in the future.
Kind regards,
Marcos
Marcos Caceres wrote:
Dominique Hazael-Massieux wrote:
Hi Marcos,
Le mardi 05 janvier 2010 à 17:45 +0100, Dominique Hazael-Massi
eux a
écrit :
Le mardi 05 janvier 2010 à 17:44 +0100, Marcos Caceres a écrit :
I was literally doing an editorial pass right now. I would
appreciate
another day or two to finish (and for you and the WG to have a
chance to
review the changes). If I check-in a draft by Thursday, could
we aim to
publish next week?
Sure, sounds good to me. Thanks for your help on this!
Any news on your editing pass :) ?
Sorry, I'm still working on it... it's taking a little longer than I
first anticipated :( I've rewritten most of it to describe a bit
more
clearly how the method was applied.
