On May 5, 2010, at 1:56 PM, Shawn Wilsher wrote: > On 5/5/2010 1:09 PM, Jeremy Orlow wrote: >> I'd also worry that if creating the transaction were completely transparent >> to the user that they might not think to close it either. (I'm mainly >> thinking about copy-and-paste coders here.) > I should have been more clear. That statement goes along with the suggestion > to make everything work off of a transaction - object stores, indexes, > cursors, etc. They'd have to know about the transaction because they'd have > to use it.
I feel that auto transaction creation is syntactic sugar and should be left to libraries. On the other hand, I'd be worried if we were developing for complex multi-tab applications and not explicitly managing transactions. Nikunj
