On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 8:07 AM, Jonas Sicking <[email protected]> wrote: > The reason I specced it they way I did, with the "lowest" key always > being used, is that this way a NEXT_NO_DUPLICATE and a > PREV_NO_DUPLICATE cursor iterate the same entries. It seems unexpected > that reversing direction would return different results?
I agree. -Ben
