When I think of this, I think of it returning the first item for a particular value. I can't think of any use cases where it'd matter either way though. Can you?
J On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 7:13 PM, ben turner <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 8:07 AM, Jonas Sicking <[email protected]> wrote: > > The reason I specced it they way I did, with the "lowest" key always > > being used, is that this way a NEXT_NO_DUPLICATE and a > > PREV_NO_DUPLICATE cursor iterate the same entries. It seems unexpected > > that reversing direction would return different results? > > I agree. > > -Ben >
