All,
What is the plan to address the following Web Storage bugs:
1. Bug-12111; spec for Storage object getItem(key) method does not match
implementation behavior
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12111
2. Bug-12272; Improve section on DNS spoofing attacks to address user
attacks
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12272
3. Bug-12090; It would be nice to have one Storage object that you could
place wherever you want.
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12090
Which of these must be addressed before the WG considers the spec LC-ready?
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [webstorage] Moving Web Storage back to Last Call WD
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 00:19:51 +0900
From: ext Michael[tm] Smith <m...@w3.org>
To: Ian Hickson <i...@hixie.ch>
CC: Arthur Barstow <art.bars...@nokia.com>, Tab Atkins Jr.
<jackalm...@gmail.com>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
Ian Hickson<i...@hixie.ch>, 2011-02-14 10:13 +0000:
On Sat, 12 Feb 2011, Arthur Barstow wrote:
>
> What high priority work must be done such that this spec is ready to be
> re-published as a new Last Call Working draft?
Tab, do you know of anything that is blocking redoing an LC?
(Personally I'm fine with it going to REC yesterday, so...)
> Bugzilla shows no open bugs for this spec
I just now raised a new one:
spec for Storage object getItem(key) method does not match implementation
behavior
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12111
--
Michael[tm] Smith
http://people.w3.org/mike
