All - based on Hixie's Web Storage bug processing today, at the moment,
there are no open bugs for this spec. As such, I will start (separately)
a CfC to publish a new LCWD of Web Storage.
Those working on the widget specs know the Widget Interface spec has a
normative reference for Web Storage and in order for the Widget
Interface spec to advance to PR (see [1]), Web Storage should be in the
Last Call state.
-Art Barstow
[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2011AprJun/0712.html
On Apr/28/2011 2:33 PM, ext Ian Hickson wrote:
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011, Arthur Barstow wrote:
What is the plan to address the following Web Storage bugs:
1. Bug-12111; spec for Storage object getItem(key) method does not match
implementation behavior
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12111
2. Bug-12272; Improve section on DNS spoofing attacks to address user attacks
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12272
3. Bug-12090; It would be nice to have one Storage object that you could place
wherever you want.
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12090
My plan is to address them in the order of they appear on this bug list:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&short_desc=&long_desc_type=allwordssubstr&long_desc=&bug_file_loc_type=allwordssubstr&bug_file_loc=&status_whiteboard_type=allwordssubstr&status_whiteboard=&keywords_type=allwords&keywords=&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&emailassigned_to1=1&emailtype1=exact&email1=ian%40hixie.ch&emailtype2=substring&email2=&bugidtype=include&bug_id=&votes=&chfieldfrom=&chfieldto=Now&chfieldvalue=&cmdtype=doit&order=Last+Changed&field0-0-0=noop&type0-0-0=noop&value0-0-0=
